CREATING SENSIBLE FAMILY TREES
I have been writing about family stories for a while, so
today is a LESSON DAY. Non-genealogists
will just have to excuse me today, and go read another blog like FRENCH
ESSENCE, my current favorite.
My Tree |
One of the most prevalent mistakes is in listing children.
Take the following as an example:
Assume the mother, Mary, was born in 1840 and was married
about 1859. Father Josiah is a poor
farmer, born about 1835. They live in
Buford Township, Union Co, NC.
CHILDREN BORN PLACE
John Nov 1 1860 Buford,
Union Co, NC
Mary March 18 1862 Buford,
Union Co, NC
Robert June 12 1864 Buford,
Union Co, NC
George Nov 2 1866 Buford,
Union Co, NC
Looks OK so
far. Mother is of child bearing age, and
married right before first child. Children’s
birthdates look logical, and are all in the same place.
Now the next
line should throw you:
Emeline April 14 1867 St.
George, Person Co, Illinois
Annie May 3 1868 Buford,
Union Co, NC
Thomas April 4 1870 Buford,
Union Co, NC
It is possible but highly unlikely that this poor “dirt farmer” and his wife moved or
traveled to Illinois and had a child “Emeline” there. This is highly suspicious. Also there is not enough time between George
and Emeline – only five months. And the
next child Annie is born back in Buford, NC, and also the following child. Unless I had unquestionable proof such as a
document which absolutely showed that the family had traveled to Illinois at
that point in time, I would not put this child in my tree.
Now using this
same “fictitious” family, let’s suppose the wife, Mary, dies in 1874. There is a citation proving this.
Then we have
listed:
Samuel June 30 1879 Macon
Co, NC
This child
cannot belong to Mary. It is possible
that Josiah married again. In those
days, people often married again and soon.
After all, there was a farm to run, a house to be kept, and children to
be looked after. Sometimes “romance” had
little to do with it. They needed a spouse,
and FAST! But what was Josiah doing in
Macon Co, which is up in the mountains, far from Union Co? The 1880 census shows him still living in
Union Co.
I would see if
future records ever showed Josiah with another wife – a will, land records in
Macon Co, etc. or these same children on a census with Josiah and another woman
or these children on a census with another woman with Josiah’s last name after
he died. If I could not prove he
remarried, or moved to Macon Co for a couple of years, I would not put Samuel
on this tree.
Let’s assume
that Josiah died in 1890. You have a
Find A Grave record for this (you might find Mary buried right beside him.)
On the same
family tree I have seen another child added:
John 1906 no location
And even:
Roger 1925. Edgecombe
Co, NC
This sounds
ridiculous, but I have seen this many, many times. It seems that some people will grab ANY
record with the same last name and stick it onto their tree beyond all
logic. I find this so often that it
seems like an epidemic. Do people really
not “examine” their tree after it is done?
There is one
other error I find often. I found it in trees
in my family name on Ancestry. When
I first found it several years ago, there were only two trees with this error,
distant relatives living in the same location.
They were probably working together, copying each other.
Old Haywood Deed |
First some
background: I have written about my
GGGrandmother Catherine Wentz (Haywood) before. There is the family
homeplace on Hiwy 74 just above Monroe,
NC where Catherine and Benton established themselves when they came from
Lincoln County about 1832.. Over the
years as land was shifted around and redeeded, there was always a portion
called “The Katy Haywood Homeplace.” It
was always set aside for her and she lived her whole life there. There is a Haywood living on that “homeplace”
today.
She had her
first son, Josiah my GGrandfather who was lost in the Civil War, and second son
John Franklin. She and daughter Margaret
Pamela, Josiah’s widow Margaret, and John Franklin all lived on the original
Haywood land, right beside each other, verified by the censuses through the
years (1840 - 1900.) Catherine was still
in her house with daughter Margaret P. in 1870 when she was 65 years old, but
she was living in the household of her son John Franklin in the 1880 census
when she was 75 years old. And, of
course, we don’t have the 1890 census. (Don’t
you just hate that! It is so “inconvenient.” I have loads of events that happened during
that 20 year time period which I cannot document!)
Catherine went
to MorningStar Lutheran Church all her life.
It was founded by her GGGrandfather, Johann Andreas Wentz in the 1750’s.
Her children were baptized there.
Catherine died sometime in the gap between the censuses. She was there in 1880, she was gone by
1900. Her descendants and relatives were
mostly buried in four cemeteries in the Monroe NC area – Old Bethel Methodist, MorningStar
Lutheran, and Shiloh Baptist Church, and Bond’s Grove Methodist, a later
cemetery. Catherine is not recorded at
Old Bethel. The people at MorningStar,
as excellent as their records are about births, baptisms, and attendance, did not record deaths! There are no tombstones apparent in the old
original wooden church cemetery. John
Franklin who she was living with at 75 years of age, and a lot of his family
are at Shiloh Baptist. Catherine is not there. She should be at MorningStar, but I cannot
prove it – yet!”
But I am pretty
certain that after 1880 at age 75, she
had NO connections with any other church or burying ground in this Union County
area, OR in South Carolina!
As I stated
above, several years ago I found two trees with an evident error. They had Catherine buried in Newberry, South
Carolina! Newberry is across the state
line and a good distance from Union County NC.
There is NO evidence of any connection with Newberry in any of the
HAYWOOD families. Somehow they had found
this tidbit and put it in their trees.
It was bad enough when there were only two of them. In re-researching my facts for this blog I now find that 74 people have picked up this bad information and put it in
their trees! (This is evidence of
how interest in Genealogy has grown by leaps and bounds in the past few years.)
I should have
sent them a message when I first found this, but since I can’t prove anything
about Catherine’s death, I did not. I
should have anyway! Now there are 74
trees with this bad information. Since I
cannot “Prove” Catherine’s death and burial, I just don’t put any info in my
tree other than Death: bet 1880 and 1900.
There is no proof about this,
it is just COMMON SENSE to know Catherine was
not buried in South Carolina.
Please READ your trees with a “common sense”
attitude. Don’t put in a “fact” unless
you can prove it. BE SENSIBLE!
Create Believable
Trees
And enjoy
I have given the announcements and info their own special page. Click tab at top. Always check out what is happening there.